Sunday, July 7, 2013

A Tale of 7 Elements: Element 85 Astatine [Excerpt]

The identity of the "discoverer" of this halogen element very much depends on the nationality of the textbook that one might consult


A Tale of 7 Elements

Image: Oxford University Press/Eric Scerri

Excerpted from A Tale of 7 Elements, by Eric Scerri. Reprinted with permission of Oxford University Press, June 2013.

The story surrounding element 85 is one of the most complex and interesting among our seven elements (fig. 8.1). The various claims for its discovery reveal many of the nationalistic traits that we have seen in the case of other elements, most notably the controversy surrounding the discovery of hafnium, element 72.

But element 85 gives our study a greater depth than has yet been revealed by the already covered elements. What this story shows is that the nationalistic prejudices persist to this day in many respects and that the identity of the ?discoverer? of the element very much depends on the nationality of the textbook that one might consult. It is also an element for which the majority of sources give an incorrect account in declaring Corson, MacKenzie, and Segr? as the true discoverers. The account I will detail owes much to the recent work of two young chemists, Brett Thornton and Shawn Burdette, whose 2010 article I have drawn heavily from.

As in the case of many of the seven elements already surveyed, the view that Moseley?s experimental demonstration of the concept of atomic number resolved all issues in a categorical fashion is once again shown to be highly misleading.

Early Claims for Element 85
The position of element 85 in the periodic table shows it to lie among the halogens. Not surprisingly, therefore, the early researchers believed that they would find the element in similar locations to other halogens such as bromine and iodine, namely in the oceans or in sands washed up by oceans. Moreover, it was fully expected that the new element would behave like a typical halogen to form diatomic molecules and that it would have a low boiling point.

periodic table

The first major claim for the discovery of the element was made by Fred Allison, the same researcher who also erroneously claimed that he had discovered element 87. And just as in the case of element 87, Allison claimed to have found the new element using his own magneto-optical method, involving a time delay in the Faraday effect, which is to say the rotation ?of plane polarized light carried out by the application of a magnetic field to any particular solution of a substance. Allison published articles in 1931 and 1932 claiming that he had observed element 85 and proposing to call it alabamium after Alabama, the state in which he worked.

In 1935, the American physicist H. G. MacPherson showed that Allison?s findings were spurious and due to imperfections in his instruments rather than to the presence of a new element. Further refutations followed in quick succession.

The next claim came from Rajendralal De, an Indian chemist working in Dacca, then part of British India and now in Bangladesh. De had trained in Germany with Hahn and Meitner in the 1920s and like Allison, used monazite sand for his research. After applying a number of chemical processes to the sand, De obtained a sublimate that he claimed to be element 85 and to which he gave the name of dakin after the city of Dacca, also spelled Dhaka. Later researchers dismissed De?s claim on the basis of the powerful radioactivity of astatine, which would have prevented him or anybody else from safely handling the element in the manner he claimed to have done at the time.

Another person who had been involved in the search for element 87, Romanian Horia Hulubei, was also involved in the discovery of element 85. Indeed it appears that he may well have been the discoverer of naturally occurring astatine, as it was later called by the physicists who synthesized the element artificially. It is these physicists who are generally accorded with the discovery of the element.

Source: http://rss.sciam.com/~r/sciam/basic-science/~3/-q639O3pT_Y/article.cfm

ryan reynolds Star Trek: The Original Series Carlton Morgan Freeman Dead Stand Up to Cancer Azarenka NFL fantasy football

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.